the writing of john scott ridgway and his mental demons -- gilford tuttle, white male christian, and johnny pain -- punk serial killer with a penchant for vegetible molestation.
the writing of john scott ridgway
Published on November 27, 2006 By Gilford Tuttle In War on Terror
What could I ever say about Iraq and Afganistan that has not been said better elsewhere by people who know more?
After the zillions of blogs going this way and that as the slow trickle of knowledge about the real war came out and replaced the one Rumsfeld and Bush made up for the press, I am wary myself of reading anything more on the topic, let alone writing about it, but it is on my mind a lot, and I can do my best, one of the things blogs are truly about -- record being an educated writer from a working class background living in the culture of the city and writing about how the times and the present state of knowledge are effecting what I am going through -- whether I am noticing or not.

Like most of the Citizens of what used to be called The Free World, when this horror story started, I was carried away on the same puffy white, dreamy lies that the media reported as true -- the lap dogs most of them have become. I believe in war in certain circumstances, and though Bush has been an Enemy of the People all his fucking life, I somehow decided that this time the snake would not be a snake and I wouldn't get bitten.
Now I of course bear a big, embarrassing scar and the poisen to this day sets my soul trembling.

Hindsight is 20 20. Admitting one has been fooled and acted wrongly is the human condition, the way we as a culture and an individual learn.

When the war was starting, in the emotional wake of the 9-11 catastophe, I held out hope for some Team America to swoop down and remove the evil dictator. I laughed off the part of the film where the Team nearly destroyed everything in the middle east to get one terrorist.

Bush and company lied their asses off, got us into a war.
Surprise, surprise, the guy who gives tax breaks to the rich (making for more yacht sales than ever before) and fights a raise in the minimum wage gave the USA another reason to ignore the poor and dump all that money in the pocket of the oil companies and halliburton and all the little buddies from way back of conservative forces within the american intelligence community.

I thought they were going to get Sadam out and the people would rejoice. I've seen too many war movies where I rooted for my favorite movie star to live, like us all...
I guess the whole minority group holding onto power over the majority by force thing is never easy to change.
History tells us that usually civil wars have to force voting to change such a situation. They also tell us that these powerful minority groups are forces to be reckoned with, and better negoitiated with than fought.

Unfortunatly, now the USA has become a lightening rod for every kid across the world who is religiously addled enough and sick of their life enough to gain the respect and adulation of everyone they know by dying as a hero. Every adolescent boys fantasy is being offered by entire societies. Can you imagine if the catholics suddenly decided to start raising suicide bombers to take control from the Baptists? Then the Baptists starting doing so? How about all these countries that have schools where america is referred to as Demonic? Can you imagine giving those kids, no matter where they are in the world, a dream of dying a hero -- they don't have to imagine how people will behave at their funeral, either; they have seen the parades and the family checks and the respect that a suicide bomber brings to their family.

It took this war to wake america up to what is going on in the middle east. And it took this last election to tell their leaders that they know what is what, and expect them to act up the ideals that most of us generally live by.

I feel like my life is in split screen, and down in one corner the war is always playing... or at least, that is a movie I am thinking about doing. Just a guy going through the day to day ignoring the box in the corner with the war.

Comments
on Nov 27, 2006
Unfortunatly, now the USA has become a lightening rod for every kid across the world who is religiously addled enough and sick of their life enough to gain the respect and adulation of everyone they know by dying as a hero. Every adolescent boys fantasy is being offered by entire societies. Can you imagine if the catholics suddenly decided to start raising suicide bombers to take control from the Baptists? Then the Baptists starting doing so? How about all these countries that have schools where america is referred to as Demonic? Can you imagine giving those kids, no matter where they are in the world, a dream of dying a hero -- they don't have to imagine how people will behave at their funeral, either; they have seen the parades and the family checks and the respect that a suicide bomber brings to their family.

It took this war to wake america up to what is going on in the middle east. And it took this last election to tell their leaders that they know what is what, and expect them to act up the ideals that most of us generally live by.

I feel like my life is in split screen, and down in one corner the war is always playing... or at least, that is a movie I am thinking about doing. Just a guy going through the day to day ignoring the box in the corner with the war.


Well, aside from the usual Bush-bashin', Rummy-reamin', Halliburton-hollerin' crap, you seem to have some good points. But this last part was what stuck out most, at least to me.
Yes, the US has become a lightning rod for the Islamic world's most crazed lunatics (especially when you pay off their heirs), but that's nothing more than an excellent reason to STAY in Iraq, take off the handcuffs and make the bastards tremble at the word "America". We should have done this years ago.

You can't negotiate here...diplomacy is worthless. The only way to beat extremists is to kill off every last one of them, and to do it in such a brutal fashion that it makes any future zealots think twice. But then, that becomes a problem because these people don't think. They hate and they act, and that's enough for them. They've been force-fed anti-American, anti-Iseaeli and anti-Judeo-Christian propaganda for the last three generations and more. It's all they know.

I watched Glenn Beck's special on Arab propaganda; stuff the networks don't show over here.
Think you know what "Pepsi" stands for? If you live in the Mideast, it stands for "Pay Every Penny, Support Israel". Did you know that the Coca-Cola Co. once headed up an economic war against several Arab states, with the benefits going to Israel? Yep; they did--espcecially if you watch Middle Eastern TV "Dateline"-type news/expose shows. Hell, "RC" probably stands for "Riches for Christians". What about "Nehi"? "Now Everything Helps Israel", maybe?
I saw a scene from one of their Saturday morning cartoons---aimed at kids....the hero kills several Israeli soldiers in very graphic, bloody fashion, then pulls the pin on a grenade belt and jumps off a cliff onto an Israeli supply truck yelling "Allahu Akbar!" The truck explodes in an heroic display of Jihad, or something. Charming, isn't it? And there are those here who think it's violent when Elmer Fudd spins Daffy Duck's beak around by shooting him in the face.
Other highlights....A Rabbi hires a hitman to get him blood from a Christian and an Arab---so he can use it in his Passover Matzos..... Evil Jewish surgeons take the eyes of a beautiful, healthy young Arab girl, so they can be used to help a blind Jew see......A 2-year-old girl is asked if she knows about the Jews...she says yes; they're "pigs and apes".....A younger adolescent Arab boy, gesturing wildly, screams into a microphone about saving his beloved country using "stones and bullets" against America and Israel....a similar display from a teenage Arab girl on some show aimed at teens.....it never ends.

From cradle to early grave, these poor people are used, even bred, as cannon fodder by their leaders. I feel sorry for them, and I do pray for them, but they want to come here and kill me, you and everyone and everything we know and love....so tough shit.
We go there, kill them by the bushel basket, and keep my young son alive.
We need to be there. Iran is about two seconds away from having a nuclear bomb.
Sure...nuclear power in Iran...it's just for making electricity, right? What about the ocean of oil they're sitting on? That's not sufficient? Say goodbye to Israel and probably several cities over here, too.

But don't worry about ANY of what I've mentioned----Bush is just a warmongering asshat out to screw the people, and we've got "Deal or No Deal", "Heroes" and that racist bastard Michael Richards to focus on.
on Nov 27, 2006
From cradle to early grave, these poor people are used, even bred, as cannon fodder by their leaders.


That is powerful RW.

Our media needs to show more of this stuff. Why don't we?

I'd rather see what our enemy is seeing than what Holly celeb is marrying/divorcing/popping out baby.

We are letting political correctness destroy our edge.
on Nov 28, 2006
Excellent reply. Thank you. I don't disagree with you, other than on the point that I know people can change. And they don't deserve to die because they have the mental disease of a religion, unless it has indeed made them rabid and untreatable. When you say kill all of them going to these terrible schools, you are saying the individual,the brain washed fundamentalists, cannot or won't change... This is perhaps true, but if so, then the society or culture must be altered to have an effect on the individual -- because individuals can be made to change.

A lot of the enemies we are creating at this point are being activated by what we are doing to their societies, every bit as much as the myths of heaven and very real money and family respect. Like the whole keeping christian armies away from Mecca thing; we may not respect this attitude, but we have to understand that there are certain levers which cause reactions in a populace... there are generals saying that what happened in Iraq was exactly what a lot of the cia predicted.

General Ridgway was the field commander over Korea. In this position, he saw a civil war being fought, and how ineffective an invading army can be against a popular movement. They asked him to take over Vietnam, and he told them they would just have another Korea, or worse... and was drummed out of the military.
I do not know, really... but I suspect the Generals in charge know their military history a hell of a lot better than Bush and Rumsfeld. There is a terrible diconnect when the president can merely take all the information of his party, strangle all dissent, and then use the positives that are left to craft a propoganda campaign to sway the newsmedia and thus the populace -- 'THE END IS MEANT TO JUSTIFY THE MEANS.'
On the other hand, I do not want the decision for whether to go to war or not in the hands of an isolationist thinking populace easily swayed by propoganda. I do not believe in Relativism, at all... some ideas and ways of being hold merit, some are harmless, and some are ticking timebombs.

The last thing your reply made me think about was 'bush bashing.' I am not sure why people who don't mind bashing others -- unto the point of saying kill them all for religious belief, then turn around and criticize someone for bashing bush (I have done the same thing many times in my work, and it is a way to get a point across, in a context, I know... I don't mean to criticize you for this... just wondering?). Bashing with words is a good way to get a message across, sometimes... however, after wondering why a few people had been saying this to me recently (and I have been writing about this for years, mostly comedy, with a character called W The Rockstar President, and have even been honored to have it in an anthology, on the arts page for CCLAP, laughed at heartily in person etc... my point is not that I am great -- I suck mostly, but that some kind of attitude shift is taking place among conservatives and liberals alike). Since there is no way to defend Bush on any topic whatsoever, the conservatives are trying to forget they are the party of Rush Limbaugh and trying to stop the discussion of bush by dismissing it out right, without even approaching the issues.

Not that I think you are doing this... you put forth a good arguement for a comment.

As far as why the liberals are sick of Bush Bashing, I know this one all too well -- they are just plain old sick of that show, and want their Arrested Development back.
on Dec 01, 2006
strangle all dissent, and then use the positives that are left to craft a propoganda campaign to sway the newsmedia and thus the populace -- 'THE END IS MEANT TO JUSTIFY THE MEANS.'
---Gilford Tuttle

I'd like to live in your country.....the newsmedia (and much of the populace) in my country has not been "swayed". Indeed, it actively hates Bush, undermines the war, and opposes virtually everything to do with my beliefs. Dissent is their bread and butter. It has not been strangled. Not even a little bit.

More later.
on Dec 02, 2006
And they don't deserve to die because they have the mental disease of a religion, unless it has indeed made them rabid and untreatable. When you say kill all of them going to these terrible schools, you are saying the individual,the brain washed fundamentalists, cannot or won't change... This is perhaps true, but if so, then the society or culture must be altered to have an effect on the individual -- because individuals can be made to change.
---GT

No....an individual cannot be ~~made~~ to change. The individual has to ~~want~~ to change. That, for exmple, is why court-ordered Rehab rarely works. The person doesn't yet want to change.
Look at the fanatical devotion Hitler engendered in the youth of Germany, and only in a few years. These people, as I said, have been fed this propagnadistic crap for generation after generation. All they know is that Isreal and America, and especially the Jews, are horribly evil and don't deserve to exist. You're not going to alter indoctrination like that.

A lot of the enemies we are creating at this point are being activated by what we are doing to their societies,
---GT

Like what, for example? They liked us well enough when we toppled Saddam for them. You have to understand that you're only hearing half the story. The mainstream media in America---the one you say is strangled and swayed---is on the side of the appeasers, dupes and outright traitors who want to aid our enemies and undermine our efforts at defense.

every bit as much as the myths of heaven
---GT

Heh...I'm not going there.

and very real money and family respect. Like the whole keeping christian armies away from Mecca thing; we may not respect this attitude, but we have to understand that there are certain levers which cause reactions in a populace... there are generals saying that what happened in Iraq was exactly what a lot of the cia predicted.
---GT

I understand all of this, but no one seems to think it wrong when the zealots push our "levers". We have to respect their beliefs, but they can freely fart in the general direction of ours.
Why should we do this? Because we're the big, bad US of A and should be gracefully willing to handcuff ourselves in order to have our asses handed to us by a pissant, non-military force? I don't think so.

General Ridgway was the field commander over Korea. In this position, he saw a civil war being fought, and how ineffective an invading army can be against a popular movement. They asked him to take over Vietnam, and he told them they would just have another Korea, or worse... and was drummed out of the military.
---GT

General MacArthur (he of "There is no substitute for Victory" fame) preceded him in that "civil war", and quickly turned an impending and crushing defeat for the democratic South into a complete and stunning victory....only to have that victory undermined and turned into an ongoing stalemate by the Socialist-leaning appeasers at the UN.
If his skillfulness in tactics and strategy had been left to command, the Chinese may likely have eventually been forced into withdrawing, and there would be a unified, Democratic Korea now. But, alas....Truman sacked him because he wanted to fight on, and with extreme prejudice, but no....it was an unwinnable civil war. At least to the UN, and the trusting waifs in Washington, as well.

On the other hand, I do not want the decision for whether to go to war or not in the hands of an isolationist thinking populace easily swayed by propoganda. I do not believe in Relativism, at all... some ideas and ways of being hold merit, some are harmless, and some are ticking timebombs.
---GT

We agree here, at least. My problem is that there is a loud and vocal segment of that "populace", which has been revealed to be smaller than its opposite, which seeks to keep us from winning a war we have no choice but to win, and win decisively. Why are we "REALLY" in Iraq? Who cares....we're there, and we should be kicking asses and taking names. We are, really, but you don't hear it in the media. I'll tell you why I think we SHOULD be there....because Iran is getting very big in its britches; and Iraq is right next door and was ripe for a takedown. Saddam deserved it anyway....he was a monster. A monster we aided in its ascension, and so was our responsibility to take out of power.

If we do pull out of Iraq before the job is done....not only will it affect our national morale, just as did Vietnam (another war that was lost for us not on the battlefield, but in the media), but this war will follow us home. Mark my words, it will.
With Americans no longer over there to fight, the bad guys will come here and start doing their thing. And when that happens, as I aid on another thread....the Leftist appeasers, dupes, traitors and peaceniks will take no blame. They'll point their finger at the Bush Administration....even if he's been out of office for 20 years....they'd find a way to hark back to his "mistakes" and blame him. You know they would.


The last thing your reply made me think about was 'bush bashing.' I am not sure why people who don't mind bashing others -- unto the point of saying kill them all for religious belief, then turn around and criticize someone for bashing bush (I have done the same thing many times in my work, and it is a way to get a point across, in a context, I know... I don't mean to criticize you for this... just wondering?).
---GT

If I'm bashing someone for their religious faith, it's only to the extent that their faith exhorts them to kill me and mine and destroy my nation.
Bush, for all his faults, seems to be one of the few people in Washington who actually grasps the grave (pun intended) threat Islamic Fundamentalism poses to Western Civilization, and America and Israel in particular. I generally support him because I see it, too.
He's not a TRUE consrvative in many ways, but he sees the same problems out there in the world that I do, and he wants to move pro-actively against them.

You know, Roosevelt had his opponents and detractors, too, but when the hammer fell, we all got together, lined up on the same side, and put up our dukes. For whatever reason, the Left will not do this. On 9/12/01, the ACLU started spreading the word that it would be taking discrimination and hate crime cases from Muslims, so don't tell me it's just because of Iraq.

We should stand together and find ways to fights this threat with the same vigor that we did Fascism. For whatever reason, (mainly residual, blind anger, spite and hate over their "stolen elections", I personally think...not to mention political power; after all, now that the Democrats have been given the nod, their talk of immediate surrender/withdrawal isn't quite so loud) the Left in this country opposes that idea.

W The Rockstar President,
---GT

Well, personally, I would have to say that Clinton more closely fits that mold. Sax-playing, groupie-banging, pot-smoking.


and have even been honored to have it in an anthology, on the arts page for CCLAP, laughed at heartily in person
---GT

Good for you. Congrats. No idea what CCLAP is, though.


Since there is no way to defend Bush on any topic whatsoever, the conservatives are trying to forget they are the party of Rush Limbaugh and trying to stop the discussion of bush by dismissing it out right, without even approaching the issues.
---GT

Well, it's just your opinion that there's no way to defend Bush on any topic, and though I hve to admit that Limbaugh is a Bushbot (I listen every day, but don't always agree with him), Limbaugh, Hannity, Glenn Beck and other conservative talk radio hosts have made quite a career, with high ratings and and tons and tons of ad revenue money, out of doing so.
Al Franken and his Air America, on the other hand, barely has two nickles to rub together, and has to go, hat in hand, rattling his rusty coffee can in the faces of liberal and Democratic party supporters in an effort to elicit donations to keep his show on the air. Some of those are even underhanded and illegal, as has been seen. I find all this very telling.


Not that I think you are doing this... you put forth a good arguement for a comment.
---GT

Well, thanks.....I try. Not always successfully. Guess I was just "on" that day.



As far as why the liberals are sick of Bush Bashing, I know this one all too well -- they are just plain old sick of that show, and want their Arrested Development back.
---GT

Heh...me too. That was good show. Of course, if some of them get their way, a coming "Developement" could be Bush's "Arrest". Heh heh heh.